Former Wynn Resorts CEO and Chairman Steve Wynn told Nevada gambling regulators that he should receive punishment for alleged sexual harassment in the workplace. His lawyers filed a motion to dismiss the complaint filed against Wynn by the Gaming Control Board.
His legal team told pay per head insiders that regulators don’t have jurisdiction over Wynn because he already left the company. Also, he has no financial interest in it. They question the state’s gaming regulators’ right to discipline an individual not connected with a gaming company.
The Control Board filed the complaint last month via the Office of the Attorney General. They claimed Wynn sexually harassed several female workers. Also, they claimed he violated state licensing qualifications.
Steve Wynn vs. Nevada Gambling Regulators
The gambling regulators asked the Nevada Gaming Commission to fine Wynn. Their investigation found several instances of sexual harassment by the former CEO. Also, he disregarded the company’s regulations and procedures.
Wynn told the best sportsbook pay per head that he didn’t harass anyone. The Gaming Commission maintained that regulators have jurisdiction over Wynn and nine other former employees of the company because they placed administrative holds on their gambling licenses. As a result, they are subject to regulatory scrutiny.
However, that’s the point Wynn’s legal team is disputing. The Control Board alleges the former CEO is not part of any gaming licensee in the state. Also, the regulators wanted to have continued jurisdiction over him through its administrative hold.
However, the regulators didn’t provide any regulation or statute to make their administrative hold legal on an individual such as Wynn. The Control board didn’t give any comments on the topic, according to bookie pay per head service providers.
The court gave the regulators until November 27 to respond to the motion to dismiss. Wynn’s party will provide its reply by December 9, according to pay per head software insiders.